Virtual Versus In-Personal Teaching of Infection Control Essentials: A Quasi-Experimental Nonequivalent Groups Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52609/jmlph.v1i3.25Keywords:
COVID-19, Infection Control, Virtual teachingAbstract
BACKGROUND In setting of the current COVID-19 pandemic, it is crucial to endorse infection control competencies. However, whether virtual training is equivalent to in-person teaching to develop such competencies requires further elucidation.
AIM We aim to explore the effect of a brief, three-to-five-minute training session on infection control competencies in the major area of emergency department infection control, using virtual versus in-person training.
METHODS Two hospitals were chosen, and the study design was a quasi-experimental multi-centre nonequivalent groups design.
RESULT The learning score increased from 39.06%, SD=17.18 (95% CI 32.39-45.72) to 52.48%, SD=26.48 (95% CI 44.01-60.95) in the virtual training group, and from 47.86%, SD=22.51 (95% CI 41.47-54.26) to 79.65%, SD=21.45 (95% CI 70.14-89.16) after the in-person teaching. The mean difference between the two groups revealed a higher learning score using in-person teaching: 27.16%; t(60)=-4.12, p = 0.0001.
CONCLUSION Infection control competencies are better acquired via in-person teaching than by virtual education.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Fatimah Alshamrani, Dalia Aljrary, Sharafaldeen Bin Nafisah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) is a flexible and commonly used license that allows others to share, remix, adapt, and build upon the work even for commercial purposes, as long as they follow the requirements outlined by the license.